Sunday, 29 March 2026

BANGLADESH DIARY

 BANGLADESH DIARY

Ian Richardson's diary of a trip to Bangladesh in February 1999 to research the true story of his Australian great aunt, Florence "Florrie" M. Cox, who got innocently caught up in a scandal after marrying a New Zealand-born Baptist missionary, the Revd. Frank E. Paice. Paice had an affair with fellow Australian Baptist missionary A. Olga Johnston. They were both dismissed by the mission society and later married discreetly in Calcutta.

The establishment cover-up of the scandal was largely aided by Florrie Cox's cousin-by-marriage, the Revd. Hedley J. Sutton, later to become a founder of Carey Grammar in Melbourne, Australia. The story of Florrie Cox was later told in Richardson's book, God's Triangle, with a cinema version being planned.

At the time the events took place, mostly coinciding with the First World War, Bangladesh was part of India and called East Bengal. After partition in 1947, it was named East Pakistan, then gained its independence in 1971 after a separatist civil war. Dhaka is its capital city.

Bangladesh is arguably the world's most densely populated country (not counting city states, such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Malta). Although there have been improvements since Richardson's visit, it remains one of the world's poorest countries with a very low literacy rate.



Day One:

On my arrival at Dhaka Airport, there was a misunderstanding, to my advantage. When I approached Immigration Control, a security guard came over and asked what nationality I was. "Australian", I said. He looked rather startled and insisted I come to the front of the queue. This is nice, I thought, as the guard and the security guard engaged in animated conversation with an immigration officer. My passport was studied, then the immigration officer exclaimed: "He's not Israeli . . . he's Australian!" This being a staunchly Muslim country, the arrival of an Israeli obviously is a cause for some special concern. Still, having taken me to the head of the queue, they were kind enough to process my visa without further delay.

Seeing the quantity and size of the luggage coming off our plane, I was surprised we had managed to stay in the air. Most of the passengers appeared to be travelling with all their worldly belongings, including their bedding, which was mostly bound around their cases with heavy duty netting. There were also a number of large TV sets. Ghetto blasters were also another popular item. Just about every second Bangladeshi passenger brought one on as cabin baggage.

I was met by a representative of my hotel, and he called a taxi for me. As I sat in the waiting room, I was making some notes. The hotel representative politely enquired. "I see, sir, that you are writing. Are you, by any chance, a poet?" (Not that you'd notice, I thought.) He then proudly informed me that he had got an English degree at Dhaka University and knew all the great classics of English literature.

The highway outside the airport was a mass of large buses, open-sided mini-buses, three-wheel motorised rickshaws (called baby buses) and bicycle rickshaws. Chaotic is hardly an adequate description. It was a huge tangle of vehicles and pedestrians, but everyone seemed to be going in roughly the correct direction. The buses were exploding with people as they barged their way through the other traffic, furiously tooting their horns while passengers hanging out the doors and windows - and sometimes sitting on the roof - gave hand signals to indicate where the vehicle might next be heading. It was quite fun to watch. It was heart-stopping to watch the bicycle rickshaws charge across the paths of buses, with apparent total disregard for their safety.

As we got closer into the city centre, the taxi would be approached at the traffic lights by beggars. One kept pointing to a dreadful growth on his eyeball; another waved the stump of an arm at me. It is very pitiful to see this and emotionally painful not to respond, but if you give money to one beggar, you end up being besieged by them. As I was to learn later, most of the beggars of Dhaka are controlled by criminals who take a share of their earnings.

The restaurant in my hotel offered a special Valentine's Day dinner, as it was February 14. It was somewhat bizarre that I should have had it all by myself. The main course was chicken breast in a heart-shaped pastry case with vegetables. As I looked around the restaurant, I could see just one couple; the other diners were a family and scattered groups of businessmen. So much for a romantic atmosphere. As I left, I was given my "Special St Valentine's Day Gift". It was a small paper bag covered in red hearts and containing a T-shirt, a Coca-Cola yo-yo, and a certificate giving me the history of St Valentine. Weird.

Day Two:

Because of jetlag, I had a terrible night's sleep, waking up at 1am, 2am, 3am and just about every a.m. until I finally fell into a deep sleep about half an hour before the alarm went off. I felt ghastly and wished I could postpone the planned day trip to Mymensingh where Florrie Cox, Frank Paice and Hedley Sutton were once stationed, but I already had the train tickets and arrangements for the visit had been made with two Australian aid workers there.

The "I want to go home" feeling was reinforced when I reached the main railway station. The train for Mymensingh was described as an Inter-City Express. The image this generated failed to match the reality. The train looked as though it had been sitting unattended and unloved in a railway siding for several decades. The carriages were built had the appearance of the trains that used to run on Australia's railways in the 1940/50s, except that this one, with its 15 carriages, was being hauled by a large, relatively-modern diesel locomotive, rather than a steam engine.

The trains in Bangladesh come in three classes:

First Class: "Oh well, at least the seats look reasonably comfortable".
Second Class: "Oh dear, those wooden slat seats don't look too good".
Third Class: "Oh my Gawd!".

Then, if you really fancy living dangerously, you can travel an unofficial Fourth Class, i.e. on the roof of a carriage. People often die doing this, of course, but it's free.

My carriage was very dusty and obviously hadn't been properly cleaned for a very long time. As for the decor, it was a rapid step back in time. But the seats were comfortable and a definite improvement on Economy on my flight to Dhaka.

The train left on schedule. The gap between the tracks widened as we moved away from the platform, and there I witnessed the astonishing sight of rows of vegetables growing right up to the rails.

As we rattled our way through the suburbs of Dhaka, there was a much less attractive sight: kilometre upon kilometre of pathetic little shelters housing those at the bottom of the social heap in Bangladesh. It was dreadful. The shelters were each about the size of a small tent, not even high enough to stand up in. Yet, in these, whole families existed, somehow scratching out an existence. Some of the shelters were so close to the tracks that I felt as though I could reach out and touch them. When I asked someone what happened to the people during the monsoons, the simple reply was: "They get wet."

About half an hour from departure, the train reached the outskirts of Dhaka and picked up speed. We were soon making our noisy way through the irrigated paddy fields. My spirits began to lift.

This being the dry season, a scattering of fields was given over to wheat and other crops. The countryside was criss-crossed by levy banks, used also as footpaths or roads, by the farmers. It was a tranquil, beautiful sight, watching the sprinkling of men and women tending their crops, cows and goats, though it would be insensitive not to recognise that the farmers have a very hard, uncertain life.

Later, we went through one of Bangladesh's few forests. The trees had large oval-shaped leaves. I asked my fellow passengers what they were. I was given three different names, and the only agreement was that they were some sort of hardwood, perhaps teak or mahogany.

Most of the houses along the route appeared to be mud brick, though some were made of woven bamboo, while a few were of house bricks as we know them.

Although the train claimed to be an express, it stopped at several stations along the way - each a hive of commercial and human activity. Inevitably, beggars would come to the windows seeking money. Being the sole westerner on the train, I was a particular target.

On the train itself, there was a constant flow of people selling food and drink. There was no way that I was going to buy either. Everyone I spoke to about going to Bangladesh warned me not to eat or drink anything outside the main hotels or in a private home.

As is usual in February in Bangladesh, the sky was cloudless. The temperature was about 30c. For most of the trip we had the windows open. This was because a) the windows were so dirty that they obscured the view and b) the carriages were unventilated and very stuffy. The downside was that when the train went through the drier areas it kicked up lots of dust which was often blown inside.

About two hours into the journey, I decided to risk the toilets. Bangladesh is infamous for its toilets, but when you have grown up in the Australian bush with disgusting outside dunnies and dunny pans, you can handle just about anything. In truth, the train's toilets were not nearly as bad as I feared. Like most toilets in Asia, it was a "squat" one with a hole and two places to put your feet. In this case, everything went straight onto the tracks - just like it used to do with the trains in Australia in the days of steam locomotives.

On the way to the toilet I came across the buffet/kitchen. My first sight was a large sloshing wet patch across the carriage. I hoped it wasn't from the toilet, and happily it turned out to be no worse than water spilling from large, open-topped water butts, from which the "chef" got water for the tea and washing up. Everything was being cooked on a couple of small primus stoves. The tables were not occupied by diners - there were no chairs or stools - but by the overflow of passengers using them as seats.

My arrival in Mymensingh was another experience never to be forgotten. I was to be met by Beavan Peel, a Baptist aid worker, and when I had earlier asked on the phone from Dhaka how we would recognise each other, he just laughed. "There'll be no difficulty because we'll be the only white people there," he predicted. And he was right. At least a thousand people must have poured off the train, joining the hundreds of people who were already there. The only problem was that I followed a group of passengers off the train, not onto the platform, but onto the tracks. Fortunately, Beavan's Bangladeshi assistant, Tarposh Mir, spotted me looking rather confused on the railway tracks.

Mymensingh station, though large and no doubt once quite impressive, was very run-down and shabby. Beavan said many of the people milling about us lived on the station platform. Some even had their cows with them.

The square outside the station was packed with bicycle rickshaws. Beavan and his assistant organised a couple to take us to his apartment, via a few spots he thought might be interesting, such as the site of the old Baptist Reading Room and the local Baptist Church which was recently attacked with a fire bomb by Muslim extremists.

The big difference between Dhaka and Mymensingh was immediately apparent: there was hardly a motor vehicle to be seen. Instead, the streets were occupied by sedately-moving streams of bicycle rickshaws. The only sound was the soothing tinkling of their bells.

Mymensingh looked even more rundown than Dhaka. The Town Hall, for instance, had once been a wonderful brick building from the age when the region was a British colony. But it now looked a ruin because plants were growing out of every crevice. A sad thing about Bangladesh is that almost nothing is cared for. There seemed no such thing as routine maintenance.

We stopped by the Victoria Mission School for Girls. This was originally set up by the Baptist missionaries from Australia, but is now entirely staffed by Bangladeshis. Beavan introduced me to the headmistress, Miss Nath, who showed us about. There were about 450 pupils, all neatly dressed in blue and white uniforms. She said she remembered her parents talking about my missionary great uncle, the Revd Hedley J. Sutton. It also turned out that Tarposh Mir's grandfather had been taught by Hedley.

Next, to Beavan's flat for lunch. It was behind the local sports stadium which looked as though it had been built several centuries ago, but was in fact a mere 10 years old. Again, there was no maintenance, a situation exacerbated by very poor quality concrete having been used. The Beaven's flat was in a very ordinary building, but was a real oasis inside, though I was told that it was incredibly hot in summer. One of the first things I noticed were low-voltage lights glowing in glass-fronted book cases. Beavan said the lights generated just enough drying heat to stop the books rotting in the high humidity.

Beavan's wife, Marion, was at the flat, and we sat down almost immediately for a typical Bangladeshi meal of rice, vegetables and chicken, prepared by their cook. The meal was eaten in the traditional way, with the fingers of our right hands.

I hugely admired Beavan and Marion, who are from Launceston. They decided to become aid workers after a visit to Asia and saw all the poverty there. Once their children had grown up, they joined the Australian Baptist Missionary Society and were sent to Bangladesh. Beavan was a microbiologist with the Tasmanian Agriculture Department. His main aid work is with Bengali women, helping them set up credit co-operatives, so that they didn't have to rely on loan sharks for credit. He also advised on health matters. One of his biggest tasks was to stop the practice of suspending toilets over dams or streams also used for washing and sometimes drinking. He said the health problems were enormous. Most of the surface water is polluted and/or disease ridden. Some time back, tube bores were sunk to draw clean drinking water from underground supplies, but this is causing the water table to drop, and in the process, a chemical reaction is now causing dangerously-high levels of arsenic.

When the monsoons come, a third or more of Bangladesh disappears under water. These annual floods are welcomed, provided they aren't exceptional, because it is the silt that makes the countryside agriculturally viable. The Bangladeshis put hardly anything back into the soil; everything is recycled in some form of other. The cows pats, for example, are all gathered up (by hand, I might add) and dried out, or rolled around sticks of timber. This then becomes the fuel for the stoves. Even the leaves from the trees are swept up and used either for making paper or for burning. It is quite common to see old ladies sweeping up along the roadside for anything that can be used as fuel or sold.

Marion teaches English to the locals, and this is popular, as English is considered very important by most educated Bangladeshis. Both Beavan and Marion are, in turn, learning Bengali (also known as Bangla). As a result, they can now have some direct communication with the poor. Beavan says most of the people he deals with are illiterate. An important part of his work with the credit co-operatives is to teach those involved to read and write, so that they can read contracts and the like and sign their name, rather than just leave a thumb print.

Beavan and Marion enjoy their work, but they do find the isolation difficult to deal with at times. This is particularly the case with Marion, who cannot easily go out of the house alone, as she used to in Australia. She would be followed and stared at everywhere she went. She said she could drive, but this wouldn't be considered right by many of the locals. There are only nine westerners out of a population of about 800,000 in Mymensingh. Of these nine, there are just two women.

When Beavan and Marion first arrived in Bangladesh, they lived in a community outside Mymensingh, and they had no telephone and often no electricity. In Mymensingh, they at least have electricity most of the time, and more importantly, a phone and access to the Internet. They use email all the time and find this a wonderful thing to have. For other news of the outside world, they listen to BBC World Service.

If you think they have it tough, spare a thought for Hedley Sutton and his fellow missionaries early this century. There was no radio, no electricity, no telephones, no air conditioning and no rickshaws - just the railway, a smattering of motor cars owned by the rich, a few push bikes, bullock carts, boats, the occasional horse and gig, and lots of shoe leather. Communications were confined to telegrams transmitted by Morse code and letters. Additionally, they had to face all the terrible diseases endemic in the area without the protection of immunisation or anti-malarial drugs. Admittedly, there would have been a greater number of westerners, as the Indian sub-continent was still under British rule, but this must have been a fairly modest consolation. Especially so, as the Baptists didn't get on well with their Roman Catholic rivals, and the British rulers were pretty indifferent - sometimes hostile - towards the missionaries, because their evangelism often caused trouble with the Muslim and Hindu religious leaders.

It is extraordinary that the missionaries who were sent to India believed that they should not only educate and otherwise help the locals, but as an essential part of their work, should convert the whole country to Christianity. It didn't succeed. In the case of Bangladesh, just one or two percent of the population is Christian after more than two centuries of evangelism.

These days it is illegal in Bangladesh for missionary workers to seek conversions, and Marion and Beavan entirely agreed with this. Beavan said some of the things done by the early missionaries in the name of Christianity were quite wrong. One example: converts from one of the main local tribes were forced to stop conversing in their own language and to speak only Bengali.

After lunch, Beavan and Tarposh took me on a further tour. First stop was the European Christian cemetery. It was quite small and very tidy, mostly because it has a caretaker. In addition to keeping the grass tidy and tending a few flower beds, the caretaker had turned all the graves that hadn't been sealed into vegetable plots. I would hope that the occupants of the graves wouldn't have objected.

As we rode about in our bicycle rickshaw, we saw lots of posters advertising the many political parties taking part in the coming elections. Because at least a third of the Bangladeshi population is illiterate, each party has a symbol, which is used on the voting paper. So, there was the Elephant Party, the Umbrella Party, the Chair Party, the Pineapple Party, the Fish Party, the Bicycle Party, etc etc. There was even a Bucket Party. Heaven only knows how the politicians get across their policies to the country, though we did see several rickshaws getting about with loud speakers proclaiming the message.

The most important part of the visit to Mymensingh was a tour of the Baptist compound. This was much reduced in size from when Florrie Cox and Hedley Sutton were there, but it still covered several hectares near the banks of the old Bramaputra River.

Mymensingh Baptist Boys' School

The Baptist mission station is now run by Bangladeshi Christians, as Hedley Sutton had always worked towards. The building that housed the boys' school run by Hedley for so many years still stands, but is now a hostel and in rather a sad state. We visited the small upstairs chapel, which is now a bedroom and study area for students. The former accommodation area for the missionaries and staff is also rather rundown. However, the Baptist Church building is still in good order, and was being used for a community training session when we called.

A fair-sized section of the compound is used as a craft and recycling centre set up by Australian Baptists. There were a couple of open-sided workshops, mostly occupied by women. They were producing made-to-order paper from recycled newspapers and magazines, used clothing, and leaves from all sorts of plants. Other workers were making boxes and various other small items, while in another workshop, women were weaving various sorts of fabric. If I understood the situation correctly, the women were self-employed, so were paid most of the money from the orders. In another part of the compound there was a training centre for disabled people, who get a particularly raw deal in Bengali society.

It was a very strange feeling visiting the compound after having read so much by, and about, Hedley Sutton. Just to think that this was his home for most of the first quarter of this century. It was a bit like the feeling I get in London when I walk down Borough High Street in Southwark, knowing that my Cox ancestors lived there for 100 years.

Beavan and I returned to Mymensingh railway station a short time before the train's scheduled arrival time, but had a 45-minute wait. As we stood chatting, a crowd gathered around us and just stared at us, as very young children do. There was no embarrassment on their part; if Beavan or I looked at them, they just continued to look back. When we laughed, some of the crowd would laugh also, though Beavan doubted that any could speak English and couldn't possibly know what the joke was. He said it was always like this when a westerner appeared. Some Bangladeshis have never seen a western foreigner, except in photos, films and on television. It didn't worry me. They weren't aggressive at all; just interested. But I did understand why Western women often found it so unsettling.

Beavan told me about two main worries they had in Mymensingh: One was getting good medical treatment; the other was what to do if they injured or killed a Bangladeshi with their car. Serious accidents are common on roads between towns - particularly involving buses and heavy trucks - and accidents inevitably attract large crowds. The assumption usually is that the driver of the bus or truck is at fault, and drivers have been known to be beaten to death on the spot. As a result, most drivers involved in accidents involving injury or death do "a runner" for their own safety. Beavan said that he would probably have to do the same. It was a terrible dilemma. Coincidentally, I was later reading a guide book on Bangladesh and it recommended quite strongly that drivers should keep going and report the accident to the police at a safe distance from the scene.

My train arrived with the First Class carriage bursting with people, and it was quite a battle forcing my way inside. With the help of a couple of passengers I was able to "liberate" my allocated seat from an interloper.

The sun was getting low in the sky as we pulled away from Mymensingh, and the families living alongside the railway tracks were resting and preparing the meals, while the children played just like children do around the world. There was one group with a wonderful, brightly-coloured kite high in the sky, while another lot were playing cricket with a bit of old timber for a bat and three crooked sticks for a wicket. Others were pulling and chasing each other and generally messing about, as kids do.

For this journey, the First Class carriages were at the front, rather than the back, as was the case on the trip up to Mymensingh. This meant we got not just the dust, but also the occasional cloud of diesel fumes from the locomotive. Because it was so hot, it was necessary to keep the window open. The occasional bit of grit in the eye was a small price to pay.

As darkness fell, the lights came on in the carriage, but they were so weak it was almost impossible to read. There wasn't a great deal to see outside, even when we stopped at a station. Electricity didn't reach a lot of small communities, and even when it did, it was in such short supply that there were long blackouts. Beavan told me that a large part of Dhaka had to be blacked out one evening to allow a major sporting event to take place under lights in the main stadium.

A hotel car was waiting for me at Dhaka station, and soon after getting back to the hotel I headed for the bar for a much-needed medicinal beer. My hotel was one of only a handful of places in Bangladesh where alcohol could be sold legally.

Day Three:

A sleeping tablet helped me crash the jetlag barrier, and I slept right through - a total of nine lovely hours. After a late breakfast, I popped across the road to the Kuwait Airlines office to reconfirm my flight back to London. I was told I needed to be at the airport at 4am. How awful.

Today I took time off to pay a courtesy call on the Dhaka office of the BBC, my employer in London for nearly three decades. I went by bicycle rickshaw and it was not an experience for those of a nervous disposition. The bicycle rickshaws compete for road space with some very aggressive driving by buses, cars, motorbikes, and auto rickshaws. It is a very hard life for the rickshaw boys and they don't live long. Apart from inhaling choking motor vehicle fumes all day, the money they earned - the equivalent of two or three dollars a day - didn't buy enough food to replace the energy spent pulling people around all day. They were grateful when they were hailed by westerners, who usually paid well above the going rate.

I returned to the hotel late afternoon, had a small evening meal and a couple of beers and turned in for the night.

Day Four:

Another big adventure today.

An air conditioned car and driver was organised to take me into the Narsingdi area, just north of Dhaka, to take some photographs for a picture agency that sells my photos.

My original intention had been to go south to Faridpur to visit the Baptist mission station where Florrie Cox and her husband Frank Paice, spent what must have been four very miserable years together during the First World War. The marriage was a disaster because Florence suffered from a rare gender abnormality and was incapable of sexual intercourse and Frank had fallen in love with another missionary. Although Faridpur is closer to Dhaka than Mymensingh, the trip would have taken two days using ferries and travelling over very rough and narrow roads, so reluctantly I scrapped it.

The Narsingdi trip began with an hour-long battle through heavy, tangled traffic, just to reach the outskirts of Dhaka. Over the next six hours, I witnessed extraordinary scenes, some of them quite dreadful; some wonderful.

The most shocking scene was when we arrived at the bridge over the wide Meghna River. There, on the south bank of the river, I looked down on a vast dump of whitish rocks on which groups of people, adults and children, sat under black umbrellas breaking the rocks into aggregate for the construction of buildings and roads. There was no machinery, just chisels and hand-held hammers. White dust cast a shroud over everything around the site and would inevitably have been breathed in by the workers. I was told that the workers are paid by quantity, with the average daily income less than a dollar. It was truly terrible; a glimpse into the depths of hell.

A close second to this scene were the many brick works on the fringes of Dhaka. Clouds of red brick dust hung in the air, sometimes almost obscuring the workers from sight. What must this be doing to their lungs?

Bangladesh is sits mostly on silt swept down from the hills over thousands of years, and there is very little rock. Consequently, the country relies heavily on bricks for road and building foundations. So, they make the bricks, then pay people to break them up. This is work mainly done by women and children who squat for hours, at home or in small factories, smashing bricks for a pittance.

On a more uplifting note, we came across a number of sari factories scattered about the countryside. The factories themselves were nondescript buildings, but outside were row upon row of brightly-coloured saris drying in the sun. They made a wonderful photograph.

At another spot, we saw hundreds of children lined up outside their school, doing their physical exercises. The boys and girls were in separate groups, each with different colour uniforms. We were up on a high road looking down on the scene. Again, I got some wonderful pictures. A couple of the teachers came up the bank to talk to me. They spoke excellent English and proudly asked me to come down to inspect the school. I would have liked to do so, but I knew that this would end up as a rather long visit, so I complimented them on their work and politely declined their offer.

We saw many schools on our travels. Around lunch time, the roads were full of children walking along with their arms full of books. Though tens of millions of Bengalis remain illiterate, those who can go to school are anxious to do well. For them, education is a privilege, not a right, as in the developed countries.

There was a hitch in our trip when we stopped to allow me to take some pictures of something or other. I got out of the car to walk a few metres back down the road to get a better view, and the ever-helpful driver decided to back up with me. Before I could stop him, he dropped the passenger-side wheel into two deep holes. The car dropped onto its chassis and was well and truly stuck. A crowd soon gathered.

One chap brought along an agricultural hoe and set about enlarging the rear hole, while some others turned up with thick bamboo poles to act as levers. Between about 10 of them, they lifted the car bodily back onto the road, with no damage done. The driver then began some vigorous negotiations with the crowd about how much they should be paid for their assistance. They finally settled on the equivalent of less than an American dollar, which they were going to split up among themselves.

One point that ought to be made is that not everyone is poor in Bangladesh. There are some very rich people here and a substantial comfortably-off middle class. It is quite common to see in the midst of the beggars and squalor people wearing expensive clothes and designer spectacles. The clothes of the female population vary a great deal in style. Most wear very bright outfits, but there are also many very conservative Muslim women wearing a black chador from head to toe, often with their faces completely covered by a black net.

On the way back to Dhaka, we travelled along a road lined on one side by communal ponds, each about 100 metres by 15 metres. The ponds were used to breed fish and to provide drinking and washing water, but they are also where all the waste from the communal toilet was dumped. The toilets, such as they are, were usually a woven-bamboo screen around a small frame suspended on bamboo sticks, just out from the bank. The locals walked out along a pole, steadying themselves on another, higher pole. They then squatted over a gap with their excrement and urine sliding down the bank into the water. On several occasions, I saw people bathing and rinsing their mouths out in the traditional Muslim manner - all within 10 metres of the toilet. It was enough to turn the stomach, but worse, I found it hard to comprehend that this wasn't a central issue of the government's health education programme.

As we reached central Dhaka, we found ourselves in the mother of all traffic jams. We barely moved for half an hour as drivers tooted furiously and exchanged curses. Meanwhile, the pollution levels went off the end of the scale. The air was thick with the dreadful blue fumes from the exhausts of all the two-stroke motors. I looked around to see if I could spot a bus, truck or baby bus not seriously scored down the sides from brushes with other vehicles. There were none. Indeed many of the vehicles looked as though they had been bashed all over with hammers, or at the very least, had been competing in stock car races.

When we eventually got moving again, we found ourselves temporarily stuck in a huge roundabout with two child beggars, aged about five or six, tapping at my window. Guilt finally got the better of me, and I wound the window down and gave them some packets of raisins left over from lunch. This was a mistake. Another beggar, a little girl, appeared from nowhere and had her hands in the window before I could close it again. I had nothing more to give her, but she refused to let go, and my driver charged off with her clinging on furiously. After about 20 metres, he stopped briefly and she finally let go and disappeared into the whirling mass of vehicles.

The all-up cost of the day's outing came to about $60, which I thought was pretty good. The driver was said to speak English, though it was only marginally better than my Bengali, which was non-existent. It improved, though, at the end of the trip when we began negotiating the size of his tip.

Day Five:

My last full day here. I spent the morning finishing my photographic assignments for the BBC and the picture library, then went for a quick Japanese lunch with BBC correspondent David Chazan at my hotel. There were many Japanese staying in the hotel, most of them there for aid and development conferences.

After lunch, I had an appointment with the Australian High Commissioner, Charles Stuart. I thought it might be useful to brief him on my God's Triangle film project. It turned out to be a good move. He had a droll sense of humour and a very good sense of visuals. In half an hour or so, he had given me a whole list of promising locations. He seemed genuinely interested in Bangladesh and liked the people, and had travelled over much of the country. My trip back to the hotel was a 20-minute lung-wrecking journey through the pollution in a baby bus.

Day Six:

I endured a terrible night's sleep. Indeed, it was hardly sleep and it was hardly a night, as I had to be up at 4am to catch my plane back to London. While waiting to check out of the hotel, I got chatting to one of the pilots on my flight. He was Kuwaiti-born, educated in the United States, and did his flying training in southern England. He told me that the crew were expecting some strong head winds.

By 4.30am, I was on my way to the airport in a taxi. There was hardly any traffic. Check-in at the airport went fairly smoothly. It became clear that the Dhaka-Kuwaiti flights are essentially a shuttle service for Bangladeshi workers travelling to and from Kuwait. The only Europeans on this flight to Kuwaiti were myself and four Canadian aid workers. As we queued up to join the plane, the arriving passengers filed past with another shipment of ghetto blasters. There was much joshing and joking between the incoming and outgoing Bangladeshis.

It was bright daylight by the time we took off at 7.30am, but for the first 30 minutes or so it was difficult to see the ground because of the dreadful cloud of pollution lying across the country.

One of the Canadians was sitting next to me and we had quite a good chat. He was a fairly regular visitor to Bangladesh and had once lived there for two years. He seemed to have no trouble conversing with the locals in Bengali. Surprisingly, though, he seemed to know almost nothing about the world outside Canada or Bangladesh. Even some very basic international events appeared to have passed him by. He said the flights from Dhaka to his home in Canada would take 40 hours from start to finish. How ghastly.

We had to change planes in Kuwait, and there was a delay because of a baby that had to travel with a drip-feed and because of arguments with the cabin crew when it was discovered that more than 10 non-smokers - myself included - had been placed right in the middle of the smoking section. The trouble was that almost half the plane was given over to smoking, so it was inevitable in this day and age - even in the Middle East - that there wouldn't be enough room for non-smokers. Fortunately, most of the smoking passengers were sensitive enough to keep their smoking to a minimum. Fortunately, too, the cabin service was excellent.

True to the pilot's forecast, there were strong head winds most of the way back to London, so we missed our landing slot at Heathrow and had to do a couple of extra circuits over London while waiting for another. We finally put down about 45 minutes late.



Reading back over this diary, it would be understandable were you to draw the conclusion that Bangladesh is a place to avoid at all costs. I should balance this by saying that I found it one of the most interesting and friendly countries I have ever visited. Of course, it is not a place to choose if all you want is a relaxing lie on the beach, but it is a country and culture that leaves you with a much better understanding of the lives of those less fortunate than we are. It is also certain to leave you with a better perspective when it comes to your own, relatively-trivial problems.


Ian Richardson's book, God's Triangle, is available as a paperback or ebook from Amazon.

Where's my portrait?

 MYSTERY OF THE MISSING BRATBY PAINTING

When I was a news editor with BBC External Services (later renamed BBC World Service), any mail for "Ian Richardson" would sensibly come to me, as there was no-one else by that name on the corporation staff. This mail would sometimes include fan letters for my actor namesake, who made a name for himself in TV drama, not least in the television adaptation of John Le Carre's Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, then later in the hugely successful BBC TV series House of Cards. I passed on the fan mail to the other Ian Richardson, and over the years we exchanged a number of chatty letters.

Late in 1982 I opened an envelope to find a letter from Royal Academy painter John Bratby, known as the innovator of "kitchen sink realism". It was an invitation to pose for an exhibition to be called The Individual in the Growing Egalitarian Society. I learned that the exhibition would include new portraits of the Queen Mother, Paul McCartney, Sir Alec Guinness, Sir Michael, Roald Dahl and many other other prominent folk.

Clearly, the invitation was not intended for me, so I wrote back to John, saying how flattered I was, but the invitation was obviously for the actor and had been forwarded to him. This amused John and he thought it would be fun to paint both Ian Richardsons, so in March 1983 my wife and I went to his house in Hastings where I sat for several hours as he did the large portrait using a palette knife and oils.

Throughout the sitting, John and I chatted about all manner of things, mostly related to the role of the individual in society. His wife, Patti, brought me several coffees in an outsized cup and saucer -- plus a frequent supply of bacon sandwiches. She would take these opportunities to study the progress of the portrait, then would return a few minutes later to hand John her comments scribbled on a scrap of paper.

Here we are with the end result:

John & Patti Bratby with Ian D. Richardson

A frequent comment from friends and family was that the portrait represented how I would look in my seventies. Well, as I am now galloping into my eighties, it is not for me to judge the accuracy of those comments. Here's a recent photograph to help you decide:

Ian D. Richardson portrait

As John and I parted at the end of the portrait session, he gave me a signed copy of his book Breakdown. It was intended for his psychiatrist and already had a hand-written dedication to him in the fly-leaf, but John simply added my name and the date and handed it to me.

John Bratby book signing

I don't know how many copies of this book were sold, but I can't imagine the deeply depressing cover would prompt many to rush it to the bookshop tills:

John Bratby 'Breakdown' book

My actor namesake initially agreed to be painted by John, but later changed his mind. He died of a heart attack in February 2007. As far as I know, my portrait never appeared among nearly 300 Bratby works on display at the exhibition at the National Theatre in London.

John offered to sell the portrait to me for £300, but I was so financially stretched at the time that I couldn't afford it. Later, after John had died and I was financially better off, I contacted Patti Bratby to ask if the portrait was still available, but she couldn't find it anyone among his collection.

A fine art dealer with access to the Bratby archives has since tried, but failed, to establish what happened to my portrait, although he found a note saying that I liked it but was not, at that time, able to afford it.

Some portraits were over-painted, but there was no mention of mine being among them. The problem is that Bratby was a very prolific artist, and there are many hundreds of his paintings held by various galleries and individuals. So, is it still out there somewhere? Or did John decide to paint someone else over my portrait and not note this in his files?

I hope to find the answer one day. If you think you can help, please get in touch.

Since my initial posting on this topic, I have been directed to a website that mentions an unpublished Bratby archive, held by a rare book dealer. It includes a note from Patti Bratby that "the wrong Ian Richardson" turned up, but she and John decided "not to let on". Not so. John and Patti were in no doubt that Ian Richardson (the BBC journalist) had been invited to their Hastings studio. Further, I had helped them get in touch with Ian Richardson (the actor).

Here's a photocopy of John's original letter to the actor but received by me at the BBC. As the quality is poor, the body of the letter has been re-typed:

John Bratby portrait invitation

 

Here's a copy of my reply:

 

John Bratby promptly responded, asking me to phone him:

John Bratby RA letter

I phoned John as requested, and as a result of this conversation and further exchanges of letters, a date was set for March 7 the next year for me to turn up in Hastings to have my portrait added to his collection. Before agreeing to this date, John wanted my thoughts on individualism, and this is a copy of the letter I sent him:

With the aid of the Internet I have been able to scroll through many of the hundreds of portraits done by John, and the inescapable conclusion is that I must have been just about the least famous person he painted.

Here's the rather restrained, for him, portrait he did of the Queen Mother:

Queen Mother by John Bratby

You can see many more of his paintings simply by doing a browser search for "John Bratby paintings"

Finally, although John and I had amiable and interesting written and spoken exchanges, he was not merely controversial but intensely disliked by a number of his associates. Here's just one indicator, an article from the Royal Academy magazine in 2009:

Royal Academy Bratby review


Mortality: The growing use of euphemisms for death

 Do you die or pass on?

Over my decades as a journalist, then as a writer of books, I became  fascinated by the use of euphemisms - particularly by people who cannot bring themselves to use the word “died”.

A death is upsetting for the overwhelming majority of a deceased person’s close family and friends, but I can't understand what is at all offensive about "died". We will all die at some time. We might wish to be immortal, but using euphemisms such as "pass", "passed", "passed on", "gone to be with our Lord", "gone to their reward", "present with the Lord", "promoted to glory" or even "gone to a better place" can't disguise the truth.

I recently came across news of a distant relative that had me scratching my head: “Born into an eternal life” and giving a date. It took me minutes to realise that I was being informed that this person had died. Another head-scratcher was spotted in an Australian rural newspaper: "Mr Johnson was bereaved of his mother". That's an interesting way of saying that his mother had died.

When I was in Kolkata, India, researching my book God's Triangle, the Baptist church that was attended by my missionary relatives had a wall plaque that declared "Arrested by the hand of death, 1st February 1839".

Many of those who prefer the euphemisms are members of various religions, but Christianity's King James Bible is certainly not averse to using "died". Indeed, a quick scan shows that it is used 189 times. It even states that Jesus Christ died.

There is nothing inconsistent in using "died" and believing that there is an afterlife. Death is a medical event that must come before a soul or spirit - if such a thing exists - goes on to Heaven or Hell or some other agreeable place, or rejoins previously-deceased family members.

My mother was an enthusiastic Christian who rarely missed church on a Sunday, and although she made careful plans for her funeral and thanksgiving service, she never once to my knowledge used a euphemism to describe what would happen at the end of her life. I also don’t recall her ever suggesting that she was going to rejoin my churchgoing father who had died decades before her.

An aunt who was an equally committed Christian was adamant that she would "die". She would have been very upset had she known that the funeral director changed her newspaper death notices from "died" to "passed on".

Out of curiosity I began looking at death notices in two British newspapers, the conservative  Daily Telegraph and the liberal Guardian, to see how many used “died” or a euphemism or avoided both. In the snapshot of about a week, the majority used “died”, rather than a euphemism. But there was also a significant number that avoided both, leaving it obvious what had happened because the notices were in the Deaths column. The Telegraph score: 23 died, 5 passed away, and 6 used neither. The Guardian had 27 died, 8 passed away and 10 mentioned neither.

It is not just religious believers who prefer to skirt around our departure from this existence. The administrator of a Facebook group to which I belong insists on using "passed on" because it seems to him to be a kinder word than "died". I disagree. There are a great many non-believers who find this not just wrong but bordering on the offensive.

I know that at some time I will die. As a happy atheist, my death will be beginning of what some might euphemistically term "eternal sleep", but it would be an illogical conceit on my part to believe that I have a soul that will continue in another form. If anything is passed on, it will, perhaps, be through my writing over the years and memories held by my close friends and my descendants. There is, of course, no guarantee that all of this will be flattering.

Friday, 8 August 2025

Aussie tourist locusts

 I have just come across a newspaper article that got me into a lot of trouble in January 1976 during a visit to Australia, my homeland. I had written it out of a sense of frustration experienced by my wife and I as Aussies living in London. It was submitted under one of my pen names which I thought would be safe enough, but the Melbourne Herald published it with this intro:

This report is from a former Melbourne journalist now working in London. His name is not published to protect him from his many Australia friends and relations

The article began with this heading and these words:

THE ART OF DODGING THE AWFUL OCKER

THE prediction that half-a-million extra Australian tourists will descend on London in the next 12 months as a result of the new cheap fares is not being greeted in London with unreserved enthusiasm.

 I don’t begrudge my fellow Australians from paying a visit to the Old Country.

 But why do they all seem to end up at our house?

The trouble with this is that all my friends and family members immediately knew that the author had to be me because of the form of the introduction. So did the guilty persons. Consequently, there was a huge amount of flak from the guilty visitors as well as a number of our entirely innocent friends and family. To say there was embarrassment all round is an understatement. 

Anyway, to risk a renewal of the grief, the Melbourne Herald article is here:


 

Wednesday, 18 June 2025

The town where my heart is

I loved Charlton, the small bush town in the Australian state of Victoria. But my life didn’t begin there and most likely won’t end there. I was born in September 1937 in Wonthaggi, where my father, John, was a printer/reporter on the Wonthaggi Sentinel. He married my mother, Rena Cox, in April 1936 in a double wedding with her twin sister, Eelin.


When the Second World War broke out, my father volunteered for service with the RAAF but was rejected on health grounds - he suffered from rheumatoid arthritis - and because he was in a reserved occupation, newspaper production.

In 1941, my father, accompanied by my mother, me and my younger brother Jeffrey, left Wonthaggi for St Arnaud, where he became editor of the St Arnaud Mercury. It was also where my elder sister Ruth was born and where I started school. I’m told that on my first day at school I wandered out of the classroom and was found in the headmaster’s office. Asked why I was there, I  told the headmaster: “I’ve come to see what you do all day”. This curiosity was to serve me well when I became a journalist many years later.

In May 1943, we moved to Charlton where my father took over the Charlton Tribune and there was another addition to the family with the arrival of my younger sister, Alison.

           

Despite being embarrassingly bad at sport – a definite negative in a small Australian town – I made some fine school friends, not least Ron Winsall, who became the best man at my marriage and remains a friend. I should also mention the late John O’Brien who lived a few doors away from me in Peel Street, Ian Nally, a son of the late Senior Constable Pat Nally, and Ken Wright with whom I had a modestly-profitable rabbiting business.

On reflection, I am amazed at the freedom my parents allowed me and my siblings. We would travel out to the Wooroonook Lakes on our bikes and spend much time in what we called “the cave” on Mt Dooboobetic, known to us as Curnow’s Hill. It wasn’t a cave at all. It was a hole blasted into the hill to investigate whether it was suitable to establish a blue-stone quarry. It wasn’t. We loved having picnics in the “cave” and when my siblings and I returned there many decades later, the initials scratched into the rock were still clearly visible. We also found the remains of our barbecue and the oil cans we used for seats.

I had a couple of after-school and Saturday morning jobs – first with the shoe repairer, Arthur Hibbert, then with the watch repairer and jeweller, John Woods. I recall putting a cheeky sign on Arthur’s shop door, Richardson and Hibbert, shoe repairers. I assume Arthur took this in good part.

I had planned to do an apprenticeship with John Woods when I left school at 16, but it was not to be. He was taken aside one day by my father who told him that I was needed in the Tribune. I was not to know at that time that my father had testicular cancer.

My father died on April 9, 1954, on the 18th anniversary of his marriage to my mother. He was just 44. My mother vowed to keep the business in the family which she did with the additional aid of brother Jeffrey and several printers, most prominently the linotype operator and compositor Doug Arundel. She even expanded the business by starting a new newspaper, the Wycheproof News, and in a moment of madness, bought the Quambatook Times and the Manangatang Courier, which were printed in Quambatook. These purchases were made without proper consideration of who was to produce them. Hence, I was recalled at a few days’ notice from the Shepparton News where I had been completing my printing apprenticeship. I became editor and sole printer of the Quambatook Times and Manangatang Courier as I was turning 20.  While there, I often listened to the BBC’s prestigious Radio Newsreel being relayed by the ABC. Who could have predicted that in the 1970s I would be in London and be one of the editors of that program!

My mother married a retired Charlton farmer William “Bill” Wood in February 1960, and the newspapers were sold to Ian and Carol Cameron. I stayed on for about a year until I was offered a reporter’s job with the Radio 3BO newsroom in Bendigo. I had two wonderful years there under editor David Horsfall. During this time in Bendigo I met Rosemary Batson – the woman who became my wonderful wife -- at the city’s Carlos and Rosita Ballroom.

And a scene from Bendigo's hugely popular Carlos & Rosita Ballroom:


In 1963, I moved to Radio 3AW’s newsroom in Melbourne. It was tough but rewarding work with some terrible shifts, many of them requiring a 5am start. However, I learned a great deal about high-powered commercial broadcast journalism from the editor, the late Corbett Shaw.

In 1968 I fell out with Corbett – I can’t remember why – and I decided it was time for me to gain experience abroad, preferably in New York. But there was a problem: I didn’t have a Green Card needed to work in the United States. Instead, to cut a long story short, Rosemary and I flew to London. She gained an office job with the UK division of Costain Construction, the firm that had employed her in Melbourne after our marriage, and I eventually won a post as a lowly sub-editor’s job with the BBC World Service.

We had planned to stay in the UK for six months, but I kept being promoted by the BBC. Rosemary gave birth to two boys, Harley and Niall, and with a friend set up London Home-to-Home, a successful accommodation business for foreign tourists.

There were many proud highlights in my BBC career: being in charge of the team that covered the summits between Mikhail Gorbachev and the American presidents, Reagan and Bush, and being a witness and coverage editor of the student and worker uprising in Beijing in 1968. I was also a founding editor of BBC World Television, along with another ex-3AW journalist, Johan Ramsland. 


There were, of course, moments best forgotten, such as the collapse of BBC Arabic Television at the hands of the Saudi Arabians who owned the satellite, but my spirits never failed to lift as I walked into Bush House, home of World Service, or the BBC Television Centre in White City.

 My days will probably end in London, but my heart will always be in Charlton.




Monday, 31 March 2025

IMPACT OF A DEATH IN THE FAMILY

I was just 16 when my father, John S Richardson III, died. He had testicular cancer that was not diagnosed until it was too late. He died a painful death in 1954 aged 44. It was no surprise that his death shook the family and his many friends. 


It had been my intention on leaving school at 16 to become an apprentice jeweller and watch repairer. I had already been working after school and on Saturday mornings with John Woods. I did the basic alarm clock repairs, while John did the clever stuff with jewellery and watches. 



As I finished my final months of schooling, John was taken aside by my father who convinced him that I was needed for our family’s newspaper and job printing business. Little did I know back then that my father was terminally ill. I enjoyed learning to be a printer — skills that I still find useful. Additionally, I was permitted to write some of the news stories for our weekly newspaper, the Charlton Tribune — my tentative start in journalism. 


When Dad died in Melbourne on his 18th wedding anniversary, my mother bravely took over the business, although her working background was mostly that of a book keeper rather than a business woman. Mum’s ambitions as a business woman were displayed when she started the Wycheproof News at the request of business men in a neighbouring town of Wycheproof. They were fed up with the truly dreadful Wycheproof Ensign, produced from time to time by Hugh Buchanan when he felt able. She then decided in a moment of madness to buy the unprofitable weekly newspapers, the Quambatook Times and Manangatang Courier, from the Page brothers when they moved to the town of Alexandra. 

The newspapers were eventually sold after my mother married a Charlton farmer, Mr Bill Wood. I went on to work as a journalist for Radio 3BO, Bendigo, then Radio 3AW, Melbourne, then for 27 years, for BBC World Service radio and television in London.

If my father had survived his cancer, I have no doubt that the course of my professional and personal life would have been very different. This is impossible to predict.


Monday, 2 December 2024

An accidental history

I've always liked writing, even before I became a journalist, so when my wife, Rosemary, and I came to the UK  from Melbourne, Australia in 1968, I wrote a detailed diary of the journey. Once we reached London, I sent a copy of the diary to my family back in Australia. I then, over the following decades, wrote to the family at least once a week. They were what could be termed "journalistic letters". By that I mean they contained illustrative detail, not just simple uninformative statements such as "We went to a local museum yesterday. Very nice".

I wrote the letters and travel diaries without giving a thought about how important they would become years later. Before my mother died she revealed that she had kept all my letters and diaries and gave them back to me. I then realised I had a detailed written history of my family from 1968 onwards. They made a wonderful read, but there was more than that as you will see from the message I have posted on Substack: 


Here is the index to the chapters posted so far: https://iandrichardson.substack.com/archive

Sunday, 18 August 2024

Tour of the Continent 1969

This is based on the diary written by Ian Richardson about the trip he and his wife, Rosemary, made in Europe in their Morris Minor van in 1969.

Friday, October 10, 1969: The weather looked promising. It was warm and sunny with a top temperature around 70 degrees Fahrenheit. I collected Rosemary from work in our Morris Minor van and promptly got onto the wrong road. We had to take the long way to Dover, which is about 60 miles from London. However, we had plenty of time up our sleeves, so there was no need to worry. We were booked aboard a Big Fleet car ferry, which was really a small ocean liner. By the time we got onto the ferry, it was dark and chilly with a thick fog rolling in. 


      The ferry set out on time at 8pm, and we immediately ran into our first hitch: the refusal of the Change Office to cash a Commonwealth Bank travellers’ cheque (something which has since been taken up with the bank). Fortunately, we’d taken the precaution of buying some French francs before setting out from London. The one-and-a-half-hour trip across the Channel was very smooth and comfortable, but because of the darkness and the fog, we couldn’t see anything. When we docked at Calais, we found the fog still with us, and very thick. We marked our arrival in France by promptly getting lost in the fog. It quickly became apparent that we did not have a hope in hell of finding the camping spot in the fog. We couldn’t even figure out which was roadway and which wasn’t. No matter what we did we always seemed to end up on the docks. So there was only one thing for it - camp there. And camp there we did. Right on the edge of the fishermen’s wharf and about a hundred yards from the ferry. 

Saturday, October 11, 1969: It was a fairly restless night, what with the fishermen coming and going all the time on top of the usual dockyard noises. We were up soon after first light and were viewed with some curiosity by the dock people. We carried on as if we’d always camped on the wharf and went on our way. The fog was still very thick, but we found a light patch about 10 miles out of Calais and pulled up beside the road to cook some much-needed breakfast. Driving-wise, I had to take things pretty carefully for two reasons: the fog and my lack of experience on the right hand side of the road. I had to be particularly careful that I didn’t travel around the roundabouts in the wrong direction. The fog remained very heavy until about noon when we were midway to Luxembourg. The sunshine was beautiful. 
      We stopped in a pleasant little village and with the aid of my murdered French, bought a French roll, a huge tomato and a bottle of cheap white wine for a roadside lunch a few miles further along the road. Unfortunately we couldn’t make the Belgium border on the one tank of petrol and had to fill up in France. The cost was about 8/- a gallon for standard grade. After getting lost a few times, we crossed the border at Sedan. French Customs stopped us very briefly, but didn’t even check our passports. Belgium, with its neat white houses and black slate roofs, appeared cleaner and more prosperous than France. But it wasn’t long before we crossed into the Duchy of Luxembourg. The border guards didn’t even cast us a glance. Luxembourg was also neat and prosperous, but we felt rather disappointed by it. I think we had expected some sort of fairytale place, which it isn’t. Everyone must have had at least one TV set, because the horizon was a forest of antennae. 
      We stopped for tea in the heart of Luxembourg city and found a marvellous shopping centre. Everyone was expensively dressed and appeared very well-to-do. Immediately after tea we set out to camp at Remich on the German border, only to find the camp closed for the winter. But not long after crossing into Germany (our fourth country for the day) we found a good camping spot along a forest track just off the highway. We were asleep by 8.30pm. 

Sunday, October 12, 1969: We had a great night’s sleep and awoke about 7am. More fog, but it was quite mild. We could hear the church bells ringing in a nearby village. After a tasty breakfast (we had a double-burner gas stove with us) we set out for Saarbrucken and back into France. We didn’t see much of Germany on the way because of the fog, but everywhere seemed very neat. The autobahns were excellent, and were pleasantly landscaped where they passed through built-up areas. The fog began lifting, and we made Strasbourg in plenty of time for lunch. 
      On the recommendation of one of my BBC editors (a German by the way), for lunch we partook of the local speciality - Choucroute garnie - a local variety of sauerkraut with all sorts of sausages and hams. It was very nice and very filling. Strasbourg seemed a pleasant city, although nothing sensational, and after getting lost (again!) we finally managed to make our way to the nearby border post where we crossed back into Germany. The change was quite dramatic - from the old, slow and poor France to the modern, fast and rich Germany. We found ourselves on a magnificent autobahn, and everywhere we saw evidence of the German mania for efficiency and neatness. Not long after crossing through the border we found ourselves climbing out of the Rhine Valley into the Black Forest. There were magnificent mountain villages every few miles. They were straight out of the postcards. Quite a few people were wearing national costume. It was all very picturesque, particularly in the lovely sunshine, now that the fog had lifted. 
      We stopped at a little village to look around and found what must have been the local vintage train society running up and down the tracks with a quaint old steam train. Something that struck us in Germany was all the churches and the large number of people going to them. It seemed incredible that the Germans, would have so many churches and so many people attending them. Somehow, somewhere, we missed a turn-off and got lost in the Black Forest (getting lost becomes the story of our lives), and as darkness drew in, we pulled into another forest side-track for the night. It was dark soon after six and we were in bed in the back of the van by seven. 

Monday, October 13, 1969: We awoke to a rather chilly, but sunny, morning. Once again, we were up at 7am, and after a quick snack, we were on our way around the northern shore of Lake Constance to Landau where we crossed into Austria. We ran into fog soon after getting under way and it stayed with us until about 11am. As we approached the Austrian border, we travelled through a lovely neat orchard district. As we crossed the border we were met by a staggeringly beautiful mountain range which loomed up like an impenetrable barrier. But for the first part of our trip through Austria we skirted around the mountains, then through the valleys. We pulled up in one valley for another pleasant roadside lunch. The villages, the scenery - everything just like it was in “The Sound of Music”, down to the tinkling of cow bells across the valley. It just seemed too beautiful to be real. But it was. Later we travelled through a dramatic (and that’s the only way to describe it) range of chalk-like mountains. Some of them were topped with snow, even though it was at least 70 degrees in the valleys. The mountains reared up so sharply they cast giant shadows. 
      About 4.30pm we reached Innsbruck, capital of the Tyrol, where we planned to stay the night. Looking down on the city from the mountains, it looked most disappointing and we debated whether to bother staying. But we decided to have a closer look. What we saw we liked very much, and for a dash of luxury we booked into an hotel, the Maria Theresia, in the main street of the same name. Not knowing at the time that it was the haunt of such film stars as Michael Caine and Omar Sharif. It was a very flash place with all the mod cons, but we managed to get a room for about £5. 


      The main unit of Austrian currency is the schilling, which is worth about fourpence. This, believe it or not, is divided into a hundred groschen, although I don’t imagine they have one groschen pieces. The shopping centre was fantastic. It was like a film set for some period play. The only thing that wasn’t quite right was the neon signs and of course the modern clothes. Not everyone wore modern clothes though - there were quite a few people wearing national costume. Most of the streets were mere alleyways. The majority language was German, but many people spoke English. Their speech seemed much softer than that of the Germans. 
      Being in Austria, we just had to try a genuine Wiener Schnitzel, so we found a pleasant little cafe and ordered just that. It was excellent, although I don’t suppose it was in all honesty better than what I’ve had in Australia. After our meal, it was back at the hotel for a good night’s sleep. We found, in addition to the other luxuries, a bed vibrator to shake our cares away. Naturally we had to try it. 

Tuesday, October 14, 1969: We were up at 6.30am for an early start (this sort of thing is going to kill us before the trip is out if we’re not careful). For the first time since beginning the tour, there was no fog. To our delight the sun was shining brightly. After a continental breakfast of bread rolls and coffee, we returned to our room to pack. The Austrians were kind enough to broadcast a newscast in English, so we were able to catch up with the latest on the Russian multiple space flight. 
      As soon as the van was loaded up we set out for the shops to have a good look around in daylight. We spent about two hours poking about in all sorts of interesting little alleyways and shops. There were some lovely little knick-knacks, but we managed to restrain ourselves. About 11am we returned to the van and set out on the next stage -- along the Brenner Autobahn into Italy. The road was excellent and the views quite thrilling. It was our first toll road. The cost was about $2, but it was worth it because it would have taken us hours to travel along the ordinary road through the mountains. At the border, the contrast between Austria and Italy was almost unbelievable. It was like having Dabron’s old foundry in Charlton up against the Victorian Arts Centre. 
      The Austrian side of the border was extremely modern, neat and tidy. But 20 yards further on, in Italy, there was a great mess. A pot-holed road, trucks and other vehicles parked all over the place, dilapidated buildings that had been erected in defiance of any planning scheme, and market stalls on every spare piece of ground. It seemed incredible that there could be such a dramatic switch in appearance and atmosphere over such a short distance. After going into four separate buildings all marked “Automobile Club”, I eventually found the one that was in fact what it said it was. Armed with some petrol coupons which give tourists a 40% reduction on the price of petrol, and some maps, we set out for Venice. The roads were very poor, but eventually they began to improve as we drove through the Dolomite Mountains - an awe-inspiring, even threatening, range of grey, snow-capped peaks. In spite of the snow, it was too hot in the valleys to wear a jumper. 
      Italy appeared tatty and dusty compared with Austria and Germany. Gradually the Tyrolean architecture gave way to what we imagine were typical Italian villages. The road wound all over the place and made driving hard work. Darkness came as we reached the Venetian Plains, which are very industrialised. After trying unsuccessfully for some time to get to a camping spot in one of the orchards along the road (to get off the road meant slowing down - a very risky procedure in the light of the narrowness of the pavement and the speed of the vehicles) we decided to keep going until we reached mainland Venice (as distinct from Venice proper which is on an island, offshore). About 7pm we spotted a pleasant camp about 10 miles from Venice and pulled in for the night. 

Wednesday, October 15, 1969: Had a good night’s rest and indulged ourselves with a sleep-in until 8am. It was another beautiful day. As we left the camping ground for Venice, I made my first driving slip-up. Concentrating on a direction sign rather than on what I was doing, I instinctively swung onto the left of the road. There was a great shriek from Rosemary and I looked up to find us in the path of an oncoming truck. He missed, but it took some time for Rosemary to recover. 
      The approaches into Venice were very dreary. They were heavily industrialised, and as we had noted the previous day, there seemed no control over air pollution. The horizon seemed to totally comprise factory chimneys belching smoke everywhere. It was a depressing sight. The parking area on the shore apposite Venice was chaotic. It took us quite a time to figure out where we were supposed to leave the car. Further time was wasted trying to find the public ferry into Venice. I think the Italians assume that everyone knows their way around the country. 
      The trip along the Grand Canal to St. Mark’s Square in the centre of the island city was most interesting. Everything seemed very run down, but unlike the other parts of the country we had so far seen, the effect was total. There were no buildings or structures out of character with the rest of the city. Evidence that the city was slowly sinking into the sea (at the rate of about an inch every 10 years) was everywhere. Water lapped against the front doors of most buildings along the Grand Canal and it was clear that the “ground” floors were uninhabitable. 


      St. Mark’s Square was quite attractive, and it was easy to see why Venice was once one of the world’s great cities. Like most public squares, we’ve seen in Britain and Europe, St. Mark’s was alive with pigeons - something that doesn’t particularly enthral Rosemary. The square was bounded by an attractive shopping centre on three sides and St. Mark’s Roman Catholic Cathedral on the fourth. Hundreds of chairs and tables were laid out to one side, making a giant sidewalk cafe. Two small orchestras provided very pleasant entertainment. A notice at the front of the cathedral announced that entry was banned to women wearing mini-skirts and other licentious wear. Rosemary decided to look around all the same. We were most impressed with the quality and the style of the clothing worn by everyone. Admittedly, most were tourists, but it was clear the locals were also well-dressed. This was particularly noticeable with the schoolchildren as they scurried home. When we found gondolas cost a minimum of £3 for half-an-hour, it passed through my mind that I’d be far better off financially rowing a gondola than working in journalism. 
      Time for lunch, and we found an attractive little cafe in a side street. Being in Italy (and because it was the cheapest item on the menu) we ordered spaghetti. During the meal two wandering minstrels wandered in, sang a song, made a collection and wandered out again. Perhaps if I’m no good on the gondolas I could try that for a living. After lunch, we strolled through the residential area nearby. All the buildings were very faded and run-down in appearance, but this was frequently misleading. From what we could see of the interior of some, they were expensively and stylishly furnished. The clue seemed to be the front door. The buildings with the heavy varnished timber doors and polished name plated appeared to be the ones with the good interiors. 
      Some of the shops contained magnificent displays of modern Venetian glass. They were quite out of this world - beautifully simple and with wonderful colourings. All the walking was thirsty work, so we returned to Mark’s Square for a drink at the open air cafe. We ordered something cheap like Coca-Cola. The waiter returned with due ceremony, handed us our drinks - and a bill for 900 lira. I paid the money over before it hit me just how much I’d paid - the equivalent of $1.20! After that bit of daylight robbery, we decided to begin heading back to the car, and caught a ferry. We stopped about halfway back to investigate one of the famous bridges crossing the Grand Canal. The bridges bore small shops and were most interesting. After a good look around, we bought some fruit and tomatoes for tea from a nearby market and returned to the van. We set out on the road to Padova and found a nice camping spot a few miles out. 

Thursday, October 16, 1969: We awoke at 6.30am (I know you won’t believe a word of this). It was another fine and mild day. By 8am we were on the road to Florence and Rome, and we got as far as Bologna before getting lost. We spent one and a half hours trying to find our way out of the maze of little streets. To top it off, we got onto an autostrade (toll-road) going the wrong damn way. We had to drive several miles to get off it, then were charged 200 lira. Eventually, we got onto the correct autostrade and set about making up for the lost time. We reached Florence about 1pm and (wait for it), immediately got lost again. 
      Florence seemed very tatty, even for Italy. We spent ages driving down narrow streets barely wide enough for one car, trying to find our way into the heart of the city. Finally we found ourselves outside the city cathedral, which is alleged to be very famous. It certainly wasn’t our cup of tea and was in a very poor state inside. We decided we had seen enough of Florence and got under way for Rome. It was becoming quite warm - around 70 degrees. The countryside was very boring until we got close to Rome and passed through a region of block-like hills with bleak stone villages sitting atop them. I imagine they would be difficult places to get to, and no doubt made excellent natural fortresses, centuries ago.            We found the autostrade surface rather rough, but it was very good in that it cut straight across the valleys and through the mountains. Most of the cars seemed to be little Fiat 500s which cost about half a million lira ($700) each, buzzing along like angry bees at 55 to 60 mph. We were directed to a very good camp (Monte Antenna) only a few miles from the heart of the city and found it full of Australians. There were no less than 10 vehicles with Australian signs on them within a 100-yd radius of where we were parked. I was told that more than 3000 Australians had stayed at that camp so far this year. And this is just one of the many camps in Rome. We settled down for the night at about 9pm. 

Friday, October 17, 1969: Up again at 7am. There were a few clouds about, but it was quite mild and looked like being a reasonable sort of day. Although the camp was ringed by trees, we could still hear the Rome traffic noises, which seemed to consist of three main ingredients - the buzz of the little Fiats, the frantic beeping of their horns, and the violent screeching of tyres. Public transport into Rome seemed pretty hopeless so we decided to take courage in both hands and venture out in the van. Naturally, we soon lost our way. We seemed to spend hours going down little streets just wide enough for one lane of traffic. Parking was chaotic, with cars lining the streets at all angles right up to the corner. Parking inspectors walked up and down the lines of cars handing out tickets like advertising handbills. It would have been nigh impossible to get about in anything bigger than our van. 
      We did get one very pleasant surprise. As we were crawling down one little street, a Fiat 500 stopped in front of us - and who should get out of the passenger side and start walking along the street but the famous Italian actor, Marcello Mastroianni. We madly tried to get the camera out of the case to shoot some film of him, but he became lost in the crowd. After driving around in circles for ages, in a never-ending game of bluff with the city’s suicidal drivers, we found a legitimate parking spot within walking distance of the Vatican. The Vatican, although quite impressive, wasn’t our kind of architecture, but there were all sorts of interesting people wandering about. 
      We ventured into St. Peter’s Basilica, but the guard pounced on Rosemary about two-thirds of the way across the foyer and ordered her to leave. They claimed her skirt (eight inches above the knee) was too short. Quite a few other girls and women were ordered out too. Rosemary reckons the guards are a lot of dirty old men with nothing better to do than look at female legs. She had been quite confident she would be allowed in because the skirt was one of her more conservative ones and certainly run-of-the-mill for London. But not run-of-the-mill for Italy, it seemed. 


I decided to venture into St. Peter’s alone (my trouser length apparently didn’t offend anyone). It was quite impressive, but I think I’ve just about seen my fill of cathedrals and they are all beginning to look the same. From the Vatican we went to the nearby Castel Saint Angelo, which is Hadrian’s mausoleum. It was built about 110AD - a long time ago. We had lunch at a street cafe. It was quite nice, and the service was good, but as with everything else, we’ve seen in Italy, there is always something to shatter the effect. Like run-down houses overlooking the cafe; like the old hag, with a fag in the corner of her mouth, leaning out an upstairs window and staring down at the street. Still, the food tasted excellent, although I wouldn’t have fancied seeing where or how it was cooked. Ignorance is bliss. 
      Rosemary’s mini-skirt must be sexier than we thought. I’m sure it is going to cause a bad traffic accident before long. The motorists shout, wave and whistle at her almost non-stop, and it’s amazing how many found some reason to slow down as they passed us. People in the sidewalk cafes openly commented about her skirt. One one occasion, a truck went hurtling by with the driver hanging out the window and looking back at Rosemary in delighted disbelief. How he avoided a pile-up, we’ll never know. 
      The chaotic traffic conditions in Rome are quite beyond my powers of description. Traffic lights are merely a rough guide for motorists, and pedestrian crossings are only for those people with a death wish. We slowly made our way towards the Colosseum and the Roman Forum. In the case of the Forum, we found it hard to pick the modern ruins from the Roman ones. They all looked so neglected, and it irritated us greatly that the Italians should treat such historic places with such disregard. I’m sure that anywhere else in the world they would be kept tidy and in pleasant surroundings. 
      After the Colosseum, we made the long walk back to the van. And it was there that our troubles really began. We had a detailed map of the city, showing even the smallest streets, and we carefully worked out the best way to get back to the camp, three miles away. But we hadn’t allowed for the Italian mania for one-way streets and constantly changing traffic flows. No matter which way we went, we never travelled more than half a mile before the traffic flow was reversed. It was like some diabolical maze. We began to believe that there was no way back to the camp. Although we had left our parking spot in broad daylight, it was now quite dark, which made the going even harder. But just as we were beginning to despair, we found the road to the camp and the nightmare ended. The time for the trip: One and a half hours! We were thoroughly fed up with Rome and decided to move on the next day. 

Saturday, October 18, 1969: We “slept in” until 8am. The beautiful sunshine had returned. We attempted unsuccessfully to leave Rome by the route chosen by the Royal Automobile Club, but it was hopeless trying to find our way, so we headed north up the autostrade, back part of the way we came, and turned off to Sienna. The service centres along the autostrades are marvellous, with restaurants, service stations and wonderful shops displaying an inventive and most attractive range of goods. We felt sorry for anyone with children, because they would never get out without spending a fortune. Today, we have just realised, is the anniversary of our departure from dear old Aussie. The time has just flown for us, mainly I guess because we have had so much to do. 
      After passing through Sienna, we cut across country to Pisa through some very interesting country, although the smells were often vile. The trouble seems to be that many sewers were open and ran alongside the roads between the bitumen and the houses. Near Pisa, we stopped in a pleasant little village to get some food. I had an hilarious time in a supermarket trying to explain with my indescribable Italian (it’s even worse than my French) what I wanted. The staff were most friendly, but I’m sure they reckoned I was the funniest thing since Charlie Chaplin. Something that is a trap in Italy is the afternoon siesta. Just about everything closes down at 2.30pm for two hours. 


We found the famed leaning tower without any trouble. Although we’d seen many photos of it, we were still surprised by how much it was out of plumb - (about 17 feet). It looked like a multi-tiered wedding cake that was about to collapse. Because of the lean, it was really weird walking up the stairs to the top. Unlike most monuments we had seen in Italy, the tower was in very pleasant, well-kept surroundings. From Pisa, we set out along the coastal road to Viareggio where we found a nice, quiet camp. Tomorrow, the Riviera. 

Sunday, October 19, 1969: Up again at 7am (and on a Sunday too!). It was very smoky and there was quite a bit of high-level cloud. We travelled along the beach front as far as La Spezia. It was rather like Surfer’s Paradise, except that the sand was grey and there were rows and rows of changing boxes. From La Spezia, we set out through the mountains to Genova. Along the way we came across an accident in which a truck had smashed through a retaining wall and dropped about 20 feet to a shelf below. We were held up 45 minutes, and to make up for lost time, got onto the autostrade to complete the 30 miles or so to Genova. 
      The engineering of this stretch of highway was almost incredible. It travelled through a particularly mountainous area, yet the road neither went up or down or made any sharp turns. Giant bridges spanned the valleys, and whenever the autostrade came to a mountain, it went straight through it. In all we counted 22 tunnels - a quarter of them a mile or more long - in the stretch to Genova. Fantastic. The cost was 200 lira (less than 4/-), which we considered a bargain. Genova has large, recently-built areas, and it was the first city we’d come across in Italy, with wide streets. It was also the first one we hadn’t got lost in. 
      From Genova, we began travelling around the Italian Riviera. The traffic got progressively worse and more and more maddening. There were a couple of times when I was on the verge of getting out and flattening the next driver who tooted me. The Italians must be the most impatient drivers in the world. At the traffic lights, you are given only one-tenth of a second to get moving as fast as possible, or everyone begins tooting. Everywhere we’ve gone on Italian roads it’s been “toot, toot, bloody toot.” I’m sure that if they could get away with it, the Italians would connect the horn to the ignition switch so that it blasted continuously from the time they started up until the time they stopped. 
      We paused along the way at a service station for a petrol tank fill-up and a bladder empty-out. The doors on the men’s toilets were wide open, giving a full view of the urinals, but no-one seemed to bother. And as I was in there having my pee, a woman cleaner strolled in and began sweeping up almost around my feet. Again, no-one took any notice. It was a somewhat unusual experience, to say the least, but in all honesty I think the Continentals have a much healthier attitude than us to this sort of thing. You may recall in my Paris diary that I lamented my failure to find a genuine French pissoire. Well, in the last two days, we’ve seen two pissoires - in Italy. But I couldn’t use either because one was under repair and the other was still being built. About nightfall, we found a camp at Vertimiglia, near the French border. We had hardly any food left, but Rosemary managed to whip up three ‘courses’ - a glass of red wine, a mug of vegemite ‘soup’ and a tin of peaches. 

Monday, October 20, 1969: Up about 7am (isn’t it getting monotonous) and we were on the road fairly smartly, seeing we had no food for breakfast. We soon crossed onto France and found a pleasant little sidewalk cafe for breakfast. The high-level cloud persisted, but the temperature was quite mild. Immediately on crossing into France we noticed an improvement in cleanliness, neatness and style. We did some urgently-required shopping for food, but we were still not able to find meat at a reasonable price. Most meat, even the poorer cuts, cost at least 12/- a pound. Butter, unappetising stuff at that, is also extremely dear, at around 12/- a pound. 
      The next major point on the route was Monaco, with its chief city, Monte Carlo. The tiny principality stands out like a gem along the Cote D’Azur. It is a very striking place with very modern, attractive buildings. The Monaco Yacht Club bay contained the most incredible array of yachts we’ve ever seen - or likely to see. Actually, they could hardly be called yachts; they were more like smallish liners - and luxury ones at that. They were probably owned by some of the richest people in the world. Monte Carlo is built on a steep mountainside which runs almost down to the water’s edge. After lunch, we visited the palace inhabited by Prince Rainier and Princess Grace. It was in very attractive surroundings with a cobbled quadrangle at the front. Security was maintained by the funniest bunch of guards you’ve ever seen. They looked rather like pantomime London bobbies. I think I’d feel safer with a guard of boy scouts. 
      From the Palace to the Casino. Admission was five francs (about 70 cents) each, but it was worth it. The interior was absolutely sumptuous - all gold leaf, russet-coloured marble and matching velvet curtains, carpets and upholstery. It was like a setting for a James Bond movie. Everywhere, stinking-rich types were gathered around the gambling tables, laying bets worth more than the entire cost of our holiday. Most were playing blackjack or roulette. We could not work out how the games are played, but could see that thousands of dollars were floating about each table. We confined ourselves to putting a few francs in the one-arm bandits and departed empty-handed. The day was getting on, so we set out for Nice. On the way we stopped at a supermarket to get a few more things. Eight items to be exact - at a cost of 20 francs (about $3.10). We found a camp about midway between Nice and Cannes. The facilities were okay, but the noise was a bit much. We found ourselves between a highway and a railway line and only a mile from the Nice airport. It was 10pm by the time we got to bed. 

Tuesday, October 21, 1969: It was a restless night, due to a combination of noise and a warm humid night. It was so warm we slept with the windows and back doors open. There were a couple of short, sharp showers during the night. We were disappointed to find the cloud still about. We decided to drive further round the Cote D’Azur to St. Tropez, playground of the film stars. We went through Cannes and St. Raphael, and found the trip much longer than expected. The coast was extremely pretty, but Cannes and St. Raphael appeared to be the only places along the entire stretch with decent beaches. St. Tropez was most disappointing. There was a big boat marina, but the town didn’t even have a beach. It was most unpicturesque. In a word, it was a dump. 
      We drove back to Cannes along the autoroute (the French equivalent of the freeway, autobahn or autostrade). We found a good quite camp near Cannes and about 100 yards from the beach, then drove into town for a look-see. The shops were open until 6.30pm, and we had a great, if tiring, time wandering around the streets. The goods were very expensive, but of excellent quality. The women appeared to be what we imagined were typically well-to-do French - tall, and lithe with long legs and very well-dressed. During the day, the cloud thinned out and there was quite a bit of sun. The temperature hovered around the 70 degrees mark. We could have gone for a swim if it hadn’t been so windy. We were finding money was going through our hands like water. Two cups of coffee set us back a dollar. 

Wednesday, October 22, 1969: We arose to a marvellously sunny day and feeling on top of the world after a good sleep and a hearty breakfast. As soon as we could, we drove to the beach at Cannes. The weather was marvellous and the water not too cold. We spent a wonderful two hours on the beach, swimming and having a picnic lunch. It was our first swim in 18 months. After a shower back at the camp, we drove into Cannes for another look around. Cannes has lovely wide boulevards and a very leisurely atmosphere. Something which had attracted our attention is that most of the girls seem to own mopeds. And in spite of their mini-skirts, they somehow retain their poise. All the big-name French designers, such as Jean Patou, Larouche and Cardin, seem to have shops in Cannes. It was nothing to see women’s suits or coats on sale at around $200. 

Thursday, October 23, 1969: Up early at 7am and on the road at 8am on the next stage of our tour - to Geneva. The high-level cloud had returned, so we weren’t so sad at leaving the Riviera. Our first obstacle was the mountain range behind the Riviera. I’m sure that we went up and down more than forward. I’ve never driven around so many hairpin bends in my life. It was really hard work. But we travelled through some thrilling country, with majestic mountains of grey or maroon rock. Some of the mountains had stone villages clinging desperately to their precipitous sides. Their very existence seemed to defy all the laws of nature. We regretted not having enough time to visit one. The mountains were dotted with hardy rock shrubs in autumn tones, ranging from yellow through brown to the brightest red. Some were terraced for agricultural purposes. We zigzagged up the mountains to about 3,500 feet and crossed into Italy through a two-mile-long tunnel. 
      There was no real need to put up a sign saying that we were back in Italy. It was quite obvious from the tooting horns, the mountains scarred by quarrying, and the untidy nature of everything. The mountains quickly gave way to the plains, and it wasn’t long before we reached Turin, Italy’s car manufacturing capital. The smoke and fumes were unbelievable. Wherever we have gone in Italy, smoke has been in the air, but the air pollution in Turin must be just about the worst in the world. It was like a thick fog, and we found ourselves choking on the fumes. We drove through Turin as quickly as we could and got onto the autostrade to Aosta. Soon we were back in the mountains. Pretty, terraced vineyards adorned most of them. 
      As the autostrade ended, we came upon snow-capped mountain peaks, and it wasn’t long before Mt. Blanc loomed. It was an angry, grey mountain with snow on its slopes and shrouded in storm clouds. We climbed to about 4,000 feet to the French border and the entrance to the Mt. Blanc tunnel, which at seven miles, is the longest road tunnel in the world. An Italian customs man made the first proper customs check so far on our trip, but he soon gave up because he couldn’t understand us and we couldn’t understand him. I think the authorities must have been carrying out some sort of blitz, because we had our passports and other documents checked four times in a distance of only 20 yards. Finally, we got to the tunnel entrance where we paid a fee of about $3. The tunnel was very poorly ventilated and the fumes were nauseating. 
      At the other end of the tunnel, heavy rain was falling, and this continued almost to Geneva, where we arrived about 7pm. We crossed through the Swiss border on the outskirts of the city. After a bit of hunting around, we found a satisfactory hotel near the main railway station. By night, Geneva looks good. The restaurants were very dear, so we settled for the railway station buffet (second class). We were delighted to find that we could get an excellent meal for about $2.60, including drinks. It was a considerable improvement on Melbourne’s Spencer St. Station, I can tell you. It had been a heavy day, with 11 hours solid driving, so we returned to the hotel for some much needed sleep. 

Friday, October 24, 1969: We had a reasonable night’s sleep, but there were interruptions from a gurgling wash-basin in the room. The slamming of doors echoed around the hallways, and the toilet next door sounded as if it was going to explode every time it was used. The rain had disappeared overnight, but some high-level cloud persisted. In daylight, Geneva seemed a pretty quiet place, in spite of a population of 165,000. There was very little road traffic, and it rather reminded us of Bendigo on a quiet Sunday afternoon. It seemed pleasant enough, but there was little to see, so we set out along Lake Geneva for Lausanne. To the south of the lake we could just see Mt. Blanc in the mist. 
      Lausanne was a lovely city. The inner city was very old and was surrounded by modern shops and homes. The meat on display was quite cheap by continental standards and was beautifully presented. After a very nice meal, we set out for the French border, crossing through at Vallorbe. We drove through some very interesting hill country to a forest near the French town of Gray and found a nice camping spot. Light rain began falling as we cooked tea. 

Saturday, October 25, 1969: We awoke before 7am to a clear and sunny, but very cold, morning. Once on the road we ran into fog. The road was very rough - so rough that the Italians would have been proud of it! The fog remained with us until midday. Simultaneously, the roads improved. We began driving through rolling farmlands with big paddocks of poor-looking chalky soil. We had a bit of time up our sleeves, so we stopped at Reims to look at the ancient cathedral - once the coronation place of French kings. The cathedral was most impressive and the stained-glass windows, magnificent. 
      Before leaving Reims, we bought a couple of bottles of wine to take home with us. About 60 miles from our destination, Dieppe, the weather began closing in. Soon it began to rain, and this continued all the rest of the way. After driving around Dieppe aimlessly in extremely heavy traffic, we found a restaurant and later a camp on the seafront. With some difficulty, because of the rain, we settled down for the night. 

Sunday, October 26, 1969: The weather cleared overnight and by 11am it was a lovely warm day. We bought a couple of bottles of wine for about 50c each to take back with us, then went for a stroll through the shopping centre. Even on a Sunday, the streets were very busy and most shops were open. It is quite an old town, but very vigorous. Like Dover, the cliffs along the seafront are white. As well as being a holiday resort, it seems to be quite a big fishing port. About midday we made our way to the car ferry, and we set out across the channel to Newhaven on the south coast of England about 1pm. 
      The crossing, which was very smooth, took about three-and-three-quarter hours. But by the time we arrived, it was cloudy and chilly. The passage through customs was uneventful, but it took three-quarters of an hour. The first task ahead was learning to drive on the left-hand side of the road once again. But it came back to me surprisingly easily. After a short stop along the way for some genuine English fish and chips, we arrived home about 8pm to find a lovely pile of mail.